Skip to content

Home Programs AI Risk & Governance

Program

Audit-ready AI — before the deadlines, not after

We build the inventory, risk classification, controls and operating model that let you scale AI — including agents — with confidence under the EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001 and India’s DPDP Act.

Last reviewed: 29 September 2026

Key dates

2 August 2026

EU AI Act transparency obligations (Article 50) apply

13 May 2027

India DPDP Act: full data-fiduciary obligations apply

2 December 2027

EU AI Act high-risk obligations (Annex III) apply, as amended by the Digital Omnibus

2 August 2028

EU AI Act obligations for AI in regulated products (Annex I) apply

See the full AI Regulatory Tracker →

AI is spreading faster than your ability to govern it

AI now arrives through every channel: platform features switched on by default, tools adopted by teams, models built by vendors, and agents that can take actions across systems. At the same time, regulators in the EU and India have set dated obligations, and customers are adding AI questions to security reviews. Most organisations cannot yet answer a simple question: what AI do we use, and who is accountable for it?

  • Unknown AI in use across the business
  • Agents acting with broad, human-level permissions
  • Regulatory dates approaching without a named owner

Governance done well speeds AI up. It tells teams what is allowed and how to get approval quickly.

Why governance programs stall

Where it stallsWhat it costsOur answer
A policy document without controlsRules nobody can follow or evidenceControls built into platforms, pipelines and approvals
Governance as a blockerShadow AI and workaroundsTiered approvals — a fast lane for low-risk use
A one-off assessmentDrift as models, vendors and uses changeContinuous monitoring and periodic review

What the program covers

WorkstreamWhat you get
AI inventory and classificationA register of AI systems and use cases, classified by risk and regulatory scope
Policy, roles and decision rightsAI policy, RACI, approval workflow and an AI governance forum
Agent governanceIdentity, least-privilege permissions, action limits, logging and human approval for agents
Evaluation and testingTest sets, quality thresholds and red-teaming for priority use cases
Data protection alignmentGDPR and DPDP alignment for AI use cases, including notices and consent where required
Third-party AI due diligenceVendor assessment questions and contract clauses for AI suppliers
AI literacyRole-based awareness and training for staff who use or oversee AI

How the program runs

1

Governance Readiness Assessment

3–4 weeks

Inventory, regulatory scoping, gap analysis and a prioritised plan.

2

Design

3–6 weeks

Policy, roles, control set and approval workflows, mapped to the frameworks that apply to you.

3

Implement

2–4 months

Controls configured in your platforms, evidence templates, training and the first review cycle.

4

Operate

Continuous monitoring and periodic reviews, in-house or through our managed services.

Mapped to the frameworks that matter to you

GDPR

for personal data of people in the EU

ISO/IEC 27001 and NIST AI RMF

for security and risk alignment

Sector guidance

for example, financial-services regulators’ expectations on AI, model risk and outsourcing

SynAdopt implements governance and controls. We do not provide legal advice and work alongside your legal counsel on interpretation.

Know where your AI stands before the regulators ask.

See it in practice

How to start and how it grows

1

Governance Readiness Assessment

3–4 weeks

Your AI inventory, regulatory exposure and a dated plan.

2

Implementation

2–4 months

Controls, policies and training in place; evidence ready for audit.

3

Managed governance

Ongoing monitoring, reviews and reporting through AI Operations & Managed Services.

Commercial options: fixed-fee assessment · fixed-fee implementation · monthly retainer.

Questions about AI governance

Does the EU AI Act apply to a company based in India?

It can. The Act applies to providers placing AI systems on the EU market and to deployers using AI in the EU, and it can also apply where an AI system’s output is used in the EU. Indian companies with EU customers, subsidiaries or AI-enabled products sold into Europe should assess their exposure.

What changed with the Digital Omnibus?

The Digital Omnibus on AI, in force since 27 July 2026, moved the main high-risk obligations to 2 December 2027 for Annex III systems and to 2 August 2028 for AI embedded in regulated products. Other obligations, including prohibited practices, general-purpose AI rules and transparency obligations, were not deferred.

Do we need ISO/IEC 42001 certification?

Not legally. ISO/IEC 42001 is a voluntary standard. Many organisations use it as the structure for their AI management system and certify later if customers or regulators value it. We design governance so certification remains an easy option.

How do we govern AI agents specifically?

Treat each agent like a new employee with limited authority: give it its own identity, the minimum permissions it needs, clear action limits, full logging and human approval above agreed thresholds. Test agents before release and monitor them continuously.

How does India’s DPDP Act affect AI projects?

AI projects that process personal data must meet the Act’s requirements on notice, consent or legitimate use, purpose limitation, security safeguards and data-principal rights. With full obligations applying from 13 May 2027, AI use cases involving personal data should be assessed now.

Get a dated plan for audit-ready AI

  • 30 minutes with a senior lead
  • No sales script — a working conversation
  • A clear view of where AI can pay back first

Please use your company email address.